Psychology and Aging Preferences for Choice Across Adulthood: Age Trajectories and Potential Mechanisms

Download 228,55 Kb.
View original pdf
Size228,55 Kb.
1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12

and Aging, 25,
289 –298. doi:10.1037/a0017927
Mather, MA review of decision-making processes Weighing the risks and benefits of aging. In LL. Carstensen & CR. Hartel (Eds.),
When I’m 64
(pp. 145–173). Washington, DC National Academies Press.
Mather, M, Knight, M, & McCaffrey, M. (2005). The allure of the alignable: Younger and older adults false memories of choice features.
Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 134,
38 –51. doi:10.1037/
Mikels, J. A, Reed, A. E, & Simon, K. I. (2009). Older adults place lower value on choice relative to young adults.
The Journals of Gerontology,
Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64,
443– 446.
Pacini, R, & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio- bias phenomenon.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76,
972–987. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972

Rammstedt, B, & John, OP. Measuring personality in one minute or less A item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and

Journal of Research in Personality, 41,
203–212. doi:10.1016/
Reed, A. E, Mikels, J. AL ckenhoff, CE. Choosing with confidence Self-efficacy and preferences for choice.
Judgment and Deci-
sion Making, 7,
Reed, A. E, Mikels, J. A, & Simon, K. I. (2008). Older adults prefer less choice than young adults.
Psychology and Aging, 23,
671– 675. doi:
Rozin, P, Fischler, C, Shields, C, & Masson, E. (2006). Attitudes towards large numbers of choices in the food domain A cross-cultural study of five countries in Europe and the USA.
Appetite, 46,
304 –308. doi:
Salthouse, TA. What and when of cognitive aging.
Directions in Psychological Science, 13,
140 –144. doi:10.1111/j.0963-
Scheibehenne, B, Greifeneder, R, & Todd, PM. Can there ever be too many options A meta-analytic review of choice overload.
nal of Consumer Research, 37,
409 – 425. doi:10.1086/651235
Schwartz, B. (2004).
The paradox of choice Why more is less
. New York,

NY: HarperCollins.

Schwartz, B, Ward, A, Monterosso, J, Lyubomirsky, S, White, K, Lehman, DR. Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83,
1178 –1197. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178
Seijts, G. H, Latham, GP, Tasa, K, & Latham, B. W. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation An integration of two different yet related literatures.
The Academy of Management Journal, 47,
227–239. doi:
Simonson, I. (2005). In defense of consciousness The role of conscious and unconscious inputs in consumer choice.
Journal of Consumer Psy-
chology, 15,
211–217. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1503_5
Tabernero, C, & Wood, RE. Interaction between self-efficacy and initial performance in predicting the complexity of task chosen.
logical Reports, 105,
1167–1180. doi:10.2466/pr0.105.F.1167-1180
Tanius, BE, Wood, S, Hanoch, Y, & Rice, T. (2009). Aging and choice:
Applications to Medicare Part D.
Judgment and Decision Making, 4,
Terracciano, A, McCrae, RR, Brant, L. J, & Costa, PT, Jr. (Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of the NEO-PI-R Scales in the
Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.
Psychology and Aging, 20,
493–506. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.493

Wechsler, D. (1997).

Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Third Edition
San Antonio, TX Harcourt Assessment.
Woodward, NJ Wallston, BS. Age and healthcare beliefs:
Self-efficacy as a mediator of low desire for control.
Psychology and
Aging, 2,
3– 8. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.2.1.3
Zachary, R. (1986).
Shipley Institute of Living Scale, revised manual
. Los
Angeles, CA Western Psychological Services.
Received July 3, Revision received November 8, Accepted November 29, REED, MIKELS, AND LÖCKENHOFF

Share with your friends:
1   ...   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12

The database is protected by copyright © 2019
send message

    Main page