Qrp’s prevented more easily



Download 3,94 Kb.
Date02.10.2019
Size3,94 Kb.

Open Science Framework is an innovative idea that will create an open and safe environment for scientists. Unfortunately it’s not applicable to all forms of scientific research. But overall, Open Science Framework will help science progress in an uncertain world.



Data sharing; Open Science Framework (OSF) makes it easier. OSF is an online platform for sharing, finding and updating data. This data is open for anyone to see! It supports workflow and helps increase the alignment between scientific values and practices. But is it really a good idea if ALL DATA is open for anyone?

Introduction

Pro

Con

Conclusion

References:Bakker, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2011). The (mis) reporting of statistical results in  psychology journals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 666-678

Contract: M. S. Lawerman: muriel.lawerman@student.uva.nl; J. N. Zadelaar: jacqueline.zadelaar@student.uva.nl; Diamantbeurs, Weesperplein 4, Amsterdam

Open Science Framework The Pro’s and Cons of Sharing Data Muriel S. Lawerman & Jacqueline N. Zadelaar Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam


References:

  • Bakker, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2011). The (mis) reporting of statistical results in psychology journals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 666-678.
  • Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science A Crisis of Confidence?. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 528-530.
  • News.sciencemag.org. Opgehaald op 5 april 2014, http://news.sciencemag.org/2011/11/scientists- brace-media-storm-around-controversial-flu-studies
  • Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615-631.
  • Wicherts, J. M., Bakker, M., & Molenaar, D. (2011). Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLoS One, 6(11), e26828. Chicago
  • Wicherts, J. M., Borsboom, D., Kats, J., & Molenaar, D. (2006). The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist61(7), 726.



Share with your friends:


The database is protected by copyright ©psysite.info 2019
send message

    Main page